Using this method, Angus Reid categorized them into four groups. They placed roughly 16% of the population in the “struggling” group whose members have faced at least four of the twelve poverty-related situations described above. Some 77 percent of Canadians in this group are facing at least one of the situations on an ongoing basis.
The second group was titled “on the edge,” which accounted for some 11 percent of Canadians – people who have only recently begun to face such challenges but are on the verge of serious difficulty.
The rest of the Canadian population was evenly spread over the other groups: the “recently comfortable” and “always comfortable.”
Angus Reid highlighted that household income is highly correlated with the four groups, although less so than many might expect. For example, more than 1-in-5 people in the “struggling” segment had household incomes between $50,000 and $100,000. Instead, survey responses indicated they were facing difficulty because of debt, the cost of living in their area or the expense of raising children.
Sixty-seven percent of those “struggling” felt they were worse off than their parents at the same stage of life. Among the “always comfortable” group, only 16 percent thought they were worse off.
Notably, when asked how they viewed the prospects for their children, Angus Reid reported that Canadians were “almost uniformly pessimistic.”
The full survey can be found at http://angusreid.org/ari-poverty-study/